VORVEXAPEX
Wireless network penetration testing

The office Wi-Fi is also a way into the internal environment.

Corporate wireless penetration testing: segmentation between guest and internal Wi-Fi, WPA2/WPA3 configuration, captive portals and resistance to rogue access points.

WPA2/WPA3 Network segmentation Executed on site
Illustrative scene of a specialist running a technical assessment
Technical operationSpecialists + Apex technology
Illustrative image
When this matters

Corporate Wi-Fi tends to fall outside traditional testing.

Application and external infrastructure tests rarely cover the office wireless network. Weak configuration, incomplete segmentation between guests and the internal network, or poorly built captive portals can offer a way in that no remote test would find.

01

Offices with corporate and guest Wi-Fi

02

Before network infrastructure changes

03

Environments with multiple branches

04

Periodic validation of segmentation

Coverage

What we assess on the wireless network.

Execution is usually on site, given the limited range of the radio signal.

01

Protocol and authentication

WPA2 and WPA3 configuration, weak keys, enterprise authentication via 802.1X and legacy protocols that should be disabled.

02

Segmentation between networks

Effective isolation between guest Wi-Fi, the corporate network and critical environments, preventing VLAN hopping.

03

Captive portals

Resistance to authentication bypass, MAC spoofing and unauthorized access through the guest portal.

04

Rogue access point

How devices and users behave when faced with a fake access point impersonating the legitimate network.

Inside the delivery

See how this work takes shape.

From technical alignment to delivery, the work has to leave context, evidence and next steps visible to everyone involved.

Team conducting an operational stage of Wireless network penetration testing
Guided executionSpecialists keep context, records and communication throughout the work.
Illustrative analysis of the technical surface and paths for Wireless network penetration testing
ValidationThe technical surface is analyzed within the authorized scope.
Illustrative executive briefing for Wireless network penetration testing
BriefingRisk is explained to both decision-makers and remediation teams.
Illustrative business conversation related to Wireless network penetration testing
Next decisionEvidence, impact and priority reach the same conversation.
01 / 04
Illustrative images
Process

An assessment carried out within signal range.

The scope accounts for locations, schedules and operational limits agreed in advance.

01

Scope and rules of engagement

We document assets, access, limits, execution window and owners before any activity starts.

02

Guided assessment

Vorvex specialists carry out the work, with Apex supporting reconnaissance, correlation and evidence handling.

03

Validation and prioritization

Findings are analyzed for exploitability, technical impact and consequence for the business.

04

Report and retest

We deliver reproducible evidence and recommendations and, when contracted, validate the fixes you applied.

Illustrative scene of a scope definition meeting
Context comes first.Scope, limits and owners are defined before any execution.
Deliverables

Priorities that consider the network environment as a whole.

The delivery separates configuration risk, segmentation risk and device behavior.

Leadership

Executive view of risk

Exposure summary, priority impacts and next steps to support decisions and investment.

Technology

Evidence to fix with

Technical detail, context, reproduction steps and practical remediation guidance.

Governance

Traceable record

Scope, period, methodology and finding status documented for audit and accountability.

Frequently asked questions

Straight answers to help you plan the assessment.

If your question isn't here, talk to the team directly.

Ask on WhatsApp
Does the test require someone on site?+

Usually yes, since the assessment depends on radio signal range at the company's physical premises.

Can multiple branches be tested?+

Yes, as long as each location and its network are described in the authorized scope.

Does the test include physical social engineering?+

They are related but distinct scopes. Physical social engineering can be combined when the company also wants to assess on-site access controls.

Is WPA2 still considered secure?+

It depends on the configuration. WPA3 is preferable, but a well-configured WPA2-Enterprise can be adequate; obsolete protocols such as WEP, and features like WPS, should be disabled.

Next step

Want to validate the security of your corporate wireless network?

Tell us the locations, how many Wi-Fi networks exist and whether captive portals are in use.

Assess my scope Talk on WhatsAppInitial conversation, no commitment
Talk on WhatsApp

Ready to assess your company's risk?