IAM and permissions
Roles, policies, accumulated permissions and privilege escalation paths between identities and services.
Cloud environment testing
Most cloud incidents start with a misconfiguration, not a software flaw.
Cloud penetration testing (AWS, Azure, GCP) focused on IAM, exposed buckets and storage, configuration and the cloud-native attack surface.
AWS, Azure and GCP IAM and permissions Cloud-native surface
When this matters
A misconfigured cloud environment exposes risk without needing an exploit.
Unlike traditional infrastructure testing, a cloud assessment looks at identity, permissions between managed services and storage exposure — often the attack path never touches a software vulnerability, only a badly designed combination of permissions.
01
Migration to AWS, Azure or GCP
02
Fast-growing infrastructure
03
Multiple accounts and environments
04
Periodic review of cloud posture
Coverage
What we assess in cloud accounts and resources.
The scope accounts for the provider, accounts, organizations and the managed services that matter to the environment.
Exposed storage
Buckets, containers and disks with public or incorrect permissions, or sharing beyond what is needed.
Cloud-native surface
Serverless functions, queues, containers, instance metadata and integrations between managed services.
Configuration and secrets
Keys, environment variables, logs and settings that can expose credentials or sensitive data.
Inside the delivery
See how this work takes shape.
From technical alignment to delivery, the work has to leave context, evidence and next steps visible to everyone involved.
01 / 04
Process
An assessment oriented to the account, not just the host.
Reconnaissance covers identities, policies and relationships between services, on top of the assets published to the internet.
Scope and rules of engagement
We document assets, access, limits, execution window and owners before any activity starts.
Guided assessment
Vorvex specialists carry out the work, with Apex supporting reconnaissance, correlation and evidence handling.
Validation and prioritization
Findings are analyzed for exploitability, technical impact and consequence for the business.
Report and retest
We deliver reproducible evidence and recommendations and, when contracted, validate the fixes you applied.
Deliverables
Priorities that account for cloud architecture.
The delivery separates configuration risk, identity risk and data exposure, with recommendations that fit the provider's shared responsibility model.
Executive view of risk
Exposure summary, priority impacts and next steps to support decisions and investment.
Evidence to fix with
Technical detail, context, reproduction steps and practical remediation guidance.
Traceable record
Scope, period, methodology and finding status documented for audit and accountability.
Frequently asked questions
Straight answers to help you plan the assessment.
If your question isn't here, talk to the team directly.
Ask on WhatsAppIs cloud testing the same as traditional infrastructure testing?+
No. Traditional infrastructure focuses on hosts, networks and published services. Cloud testing also assesses identity, permissions between managed services and provider-specific configuration.
Do you test AWS, Azure and GCP?+
Yes, adapting the methodology to the services and permission model of each provider.
Do we need to grant read access to the cloud account?+
Read-only access normally speeds up the review of IAM and configuration, but external-only scenarios can also be arranged depending on the objective.
Does the test respect the shared responsibility model?+
Yes. Recommendations distinguish what is under the customer's control from what belongs to the cloud provider.
Next step
Want to validate the security posture of your cloud environment?
Tell us the provider, how many accounts you run and which managed services belong in scope.