VORVEXAPEX
Social engineering testing

The strongest technical control fails when someone is talked into opening the door for the attacker.

Controlled phishing, vishing and physical social engineering simulations to measure how well people and processes resist manipulation, usually paired with awareness programs.

Phishing and vishing Controlled physical simulation Metrics for awareness programs
Illustrative scene of a specialist running a technical assessment
Technical operationSpecialists + Apex technology
Illustrative image
When this matters

People are part of the attack surface too.

Firewalls, MFA and access controls do not stop an employee from clicking a malicious link, giving a password over the phone or unlocking a door for someone with a convincing pretext. The assessment simulates those vectors — email, phone and physical presence — under formal authorization, measuring real behavior rather than what people say they would do in training.

01

Before or after awareness programs

02

Sectors with high fraud exposure

03

Areas with sensitive physical access

04

Validating help desk and reception processes

Vectors assessed

How we simulate real manipulation attempts.

The scope and the pretexts used are defined and formally approved before execution.

01

Targeted phishing

Email campaigns simulating realistic scenarios, measuring clicks, credential submission and how often employees report the attempt.

02

Vishing

Calls with a controlled pretext, testing whether the help desk, reception or other roles release information or reset access improperly.

03

Physical social engineering

Attempts to enter facilities through tailgating, an in-person pretext or deliberately dropped devices, assessing physical controls and vigilance.

04

Metrics for awareness

Aggregate indicators of behavioral exposure that feed training programs and future campaigns.

Inside the delivery

See how this work takes shape.

From technical alignment to delivery, the work has to leave context, evidence and next steps visible to everyone involved.

Team conducting an operational stage of Social engineering testing
Guided executionSpecialists keep context, records and communication throughout the work.
Illustrative analysis of the technical surface and paths for Social engineering testing
ValidationThe technical surface is analyzed within the authorized scope.
Illustrative executive briefing for Social engineering testing
BriefingRisk is explained to both decision-makers and remediation teams.
Illustrative business conversation related to Social engineering testing
Next decisionEvidence, impact and priority reach the same conversation.
01 / 04
Illustrative images
Process

A simulation with clear ethical and legal limits.

Execution follows rules agreed with the company to avoid harm, unnecessary embarrassment or risk to the operation.

01

Pretext and audience definition

We choose realistic scenarios and the scope of employees, areas or roles to be assessed.

02

Authorization and emergency contacts

We formalize limits, internal owners and a contact who can stop the simulation if needed.

03

Controlled execution

We run the phishing, vishing or physical access attempts within the agreed limits.

04

Debrief and recommendations

We present aggregate metrics and suggestions to strengthen processes and training, without singling people out punitively.

Illustrative scene of a scope definition meeting
Context comes first.Scope, limits and owners are defined before any execution.
Deliverables

A result aimed at process and culture, not at blaming people.

The delivery prioritizes what the company can adjust in processes, controls and training.

Leadership

A real view of behavioral exposure

Objective metrics on how people and processes respond to manipulation attempts.

Physical security / HR

Gaps in access control and front-desk handling

Points to strengthen in reception, building entry, help desk and identity verification processes.

Information security

Input for targeted training

Real scenarios used to make awareness campaigns more relevant.

Frequently asked questions

Straight answers to help you plan the assessment.

If your question isn't here, talk to the team directly.

Ask on WhatsApp
Is it unethical to run phishing simulations on your own employees?+

When conducted with formal authorization, HR involvement and a focus on training rather than individual punishment, the simulation is a recognized practice for measuring and improving human response to real attacks.

What happens to whoever falls for the simulation?+

The goal is not to find culprits. Results are normally reported in aggregate and used to steer training, unless the company explicitly asks for individual follow-up.

Can physical social engineering cause problems with building security?+

That is why we formalize limits, internal owners and an emergency contact in advance, including an authorization letter the team can present if approached during the simulation.

Does this replace security awareness training?+

No. The simulation is normally bought alongside awareness programs, serving as a baseline measurement, a reinforcement or a way to validate results over time.

Next step

Want to measure how well your company actually resists manipulation?

Tell us the vectors you care about (phishing, vishing, physical), the target audience and whether an awareness program is already running.

Assess my scope Talk on WhatsAppInitial conversation, no commitment
Talk on WhatsApp

Ready to assess your company's risk?