Security testing (8.29)
Evidence that applications and systems undergo security assessment before or during the development and acceptance cycle.
How penetration testing supports the ISO 27001 certification cycle and surveillance audits, serving as technical evidence for the Annex A security testing controls.

An ISO 27001 certification audit mainly assesses policy, governance, risk management and the operation of the Information Security Management System (ISMS) — it is not itself a technical test. When the Statement of Applicability (SoA) includes controls such as security testing in development (8.29) or technical vulnerability management (8.8) in the 2022 version of Annex A, the auditor expects evidence that those controls operate in practice. A penetration test provides exactly that kind of technical proof, complementing — not replacing — the documentary audit.
Preparing for initial certification
Surveillance audits and recertification
Annex A controls related to technical testing
Requirements from customers who audit the ISMS
The exact mapping depends on the version adopted (2013 or 2022) and how each control was described in the Statement of Applicability.
Evidence that applications and systems undergo security assessment before or during the development and acceptance cycle.
A record of identifying, prioritizing and handling technical vulnerabilities found in the assessed environment.
The certification auditor checks that the control is described and operating; the penetration test produces the technical data behind that check.
Scope, methodology, execution date and finding treatment recorded so they can be consulted in future audits.
From technical alignment to delivery, the work has to leave context, evidence and next steps visible to everyone involved.




We align the calendar and documentation to the certification and surveillance rhythm of your ISMS.
We work out which Statement of Applicability controls depend on evidence of technical testing.
We apply the penetration testing methodology to the scope that underpins the identified controls.
We document scope, methodology and outcome in a format the certification auditor can review directly.
We indicate when the test should be repeated to keep pace with surveillance audits or significant environment changes.

The report supports whoever answers the auditor and whoever fixes the identified risk.
Technical documentation ready to present during certification and surveillance audits.
Findings feed the vulnerability management process required by control 8.8.
Assurance that the controls described in the Statement of Applicability match the technical reality of the environment.
If your question isn't here, talk to the team directly.
Ask on WhatsAppThe standard does not literally require a 'penetration test' by name, but when a company declares security testing or technical vulnerability management controls in the Statement of Applicability, the auditor expects evidence that those controls are executed in practice.
In the 2022 version the most directly related controls are 8.29 (security testing in development and acceptance) and 8.8 (technical vulnerability management). In the 2013 version, the equivalents appear as A.14.2.8 and A.12.6.1.
No. The auditor reviews documentation, processes and evidence presented by the company. The technical test is a separate service, contracted before or during the audit cycle.
The standard sets no single frequency; the cadence usually follows the annual surveillance audits and any significant change to the environment that underpins the declared controls.
Tell us which Annex A version you adopted, the controls tied to technical testing and the date of your next audit.
Ready to assess your company's risk?